Legal Opinion

Minnesota v. Brundage

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1901No. 159PublishedCited by 67 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. The case is stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe appellee Brundage was arrested under a warrant issued by the Municipal Court of Minneapolis, Minnesota, upon the complaint under oath of. the Inspector of the State Dairy and Food Department of that State charging him with having violated a statute of Minnesota approved April 19, 1899, entitled “ An act to prevent fraud in the sale Of dairy products, their imitations or substitutes, to prohibit and prevent the manufacture or sale of unhealthy or adulterated dairy products, and to preserve the public health.” Gen: Laws, Minnesota, 1899, c. 295.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Albert Moore v. John Deyoung, Warden, Passaic County Jail, and Frank Davenport, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API