Legal Opinion

McNulty v. . Solley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, made December 1, 1883, which affirmed an order of Special Term discontinuing the action. (Reported below, 31 Hun, 17.) The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The proposition to arbitrate, with the refusal of the arbitrators to accept the proposition, was insufficient to withdraw the cause from the court to another tribunal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, made December 1, 1883, which affirmed an order of Special Term discontinuing the action. (Reported below, 31 Hun, 17.) The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. The proposition to arbitrate, with the refusal of the arbitrators to accept the proposition, was insufficient to withdraw the cause from the court to another tribunal. (Morse on Arbitrations, 80; Chapman v. Seecomb, 36 Me. 102; Elliott v. Quimby, 13 N. H. 183 ; Woolley v. Clark, 2 D. & Ry. 158 ; Haggart v. Morgan, 5 N. Y. 422; Harper v.…

1Opinion of the CourtDanforth, J.

After issue, while the action was pending and on the trial calendar, the parties, under the advice of certain persons styled a committee, executed an agreement in these words: “New York, April 27,1883. Mr. McNulty named Sami. Shethar, Mr. Solley named E. Y. Connett; the committee named H. M. Silverman.”

“We, the undersigned, hereby agree to leave our differences to the above named parties, Shethar, Connett and Silverman, as arbitrators, whose decision shall be final.”

Afterward the plaintiff’s counsel had the cause set down for trial at the Circuit for the 16th of May, 1883. On the 10th of May…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells v. LaneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. Larkin v. RobbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Bank of Monroe v. WidnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. People v. Onondaga Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. Camp v. RootNew York Supreme Court · 1820

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Union Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. NashNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Goodwin v. Merchants' & Bankers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
  4. TRAFFORD v. City of WestbrookDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
  5. Goldstein v. SchleiferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API