Legal Opinion
Stock v. Meek
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1952No. Civ. 18953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff appeals from (1) an order granting defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, and (2) the judgment predicated upon the order.
Facts: This cause has previously been before the Supreme Court on appeal in Stock v. Meek, 35 Cal.2d 809 [221 P.2d 232], and the facts are thus stated in that opinion beginning at page 811:
“Plaintiff brought this action to rescind the purchase from defendants, husband and wife, of space in a cooperatively-owned apartment house and to recover the amount she had paid defendants therefor. Defendants counterclaimed for interest that they had paid plaintiff on a usurious…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Stimson v. Alessandro Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. Mariposa CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Kirman v. BorzageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Morris Plan Co. v. KahenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beverly Hills National Bank v. GlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hanna v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hanna v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989