Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Co. v. Kahen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1933No. Docket No. 1443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARMER, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action in a justice’s court with a jurisdiction of $300. Defendant Frederick E. Kahen answered and filed a counterclaim. The case was tried in the justice’s court and defendant Kahen appealed to the superior court, which said court tried the case de novo and entered its judgment on the counterclaim in the sum of $55.22 and costs. Plaintiff appealed to this court and the defendant moved to dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss was denied (Morris Plan Co. of Orange County v. Kahen, 131 Cal. App. 761 [22 Pac. (2d) 36]). All questions therein decided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Deacon v. BryansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Morris Plan Co. v. KahenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. VeitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API