Legal Opinion

Dearing, Inc. v. Spiller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1992No. 2-91-107-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Defendants Dearing, Inc. and Royal Petroleum Corporation appeal from an adverse judgment based upon jury findings that they breached their duty of utmost good faith. Plaintiffs sought, and were awarded a variety of damages, including exemplary damages against both defendants. We affirm.

In 1943, a 600-acre tract of land owned by the Haag family was conveyed to R.H. Dearing & Sons. The deed conveyed the property in its entirety to Dearing but reserved to the Haags an undivided ⅝ interest in the minerals. The lease also granted Dearing the exclusive right to execute leases on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Texas Bank and Trust Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Manges v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Marrs & Smith Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil & Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  3. Hlavinka v. Hancock, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. XTO Energy Inc. v. NikolaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Mafrige v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API