Legal Opinion
Hlavinka v. Hancock
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 2, 2003No. 13-01-00209-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellees, 1 non-executive mineral interest owners, sued appellants, Joseph C. Hlavinka, Jr., Terrance Hlavinka, and Kenneth Hlavinka (“the Hlavinkas”), owners of the executive and surface rights of an 802.25 acre tract of land located in Wharton County for breach of fiduciary duty. In three issues, the Hlavinkas contend: (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding of liability; (2) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding of damages; and (3) the trial court erred in its…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- KCM Financial LLC v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Marrs & Smith Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil & Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Grinnell v. Munson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Lesley v. VETERANS LAND BD. OF STATETexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Sauceda v. Kerlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.