Legal Opinion

Heard Ex Rel. Heard v. Payne

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 5, 1984No. 83-279PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The trial court dismissed appellants’ petition for mandamus at the close of appellants’ presentation of evidence in a trial before the court. The appellants here argue that the court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the appellee. They contend that Act 244 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1967 contained a typographical error, that a chiropractor is a licensed physician in this case, and that the word “may” in Act 244 means “shall.” We hold that a chiropractor is not a licensed physician in this case and affirm the trial court.

Dexter Owen Heard and Dustin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Black v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Shinn v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Phillips Petroleum Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Duty v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Double "D" Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Simmons First National Bank v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Griffin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Stover v. StoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Jones v. Double "D" Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API