Heard Ex Rel. Heard v. Payne
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
The trial court dismissed appellants’ petition for mandamus at the close of appellants’ presentation of evidence in a trial before the court. The appellants here argue that the court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the appellee. They contend that Act 244 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1967 contained a typographical error, that a chiropractor is a licensed physician in this case, and that the word “may” in Act 244 means “shall.” We hold that a chiropractor is not a licensed physician in this case and affirm the trial court.
Dexter Owen Heard and Dustin…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Black v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Shinn v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Duty v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. Double "D" Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Simmons First National Bank v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Griffin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Stover v. StoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Jones v. Double "D" Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.