Legal Opinion

People v. Enriquez

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1967No. Crim. 10087PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to change his guilty pleas to not guilty. The basic question is whether, under rules established in In re Estrada, 63 Cal.2d 740 [48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948], and In re Kirk, 63 Cal.2d 761 [48 Cal.Rptr. 186, 408 P.2d 962], defendant is entitled to the benefit of an amendment to section 476a of the Penal Code adopted and effective before his conviction became final. There can be no doubt that the amended statute is applicable to defendant and that he is entitled to some form of relief.

Before the Estrada point is discussed, however, a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. NasalgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API