People v. Rollins
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
The present appeal requires us to determine once again1 which cases are to be governed in this state by the principles set forth in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) 378 U.S. 478 [12 L.Ed.2d 977, 84 S.Ct. 1758], and to decide for the first time2 which cases, among those governed by Escobedo, should also be subject to the more detailed guidelines enunciated in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974],
The trial in this case began on May 13, 1963. Defendant, George Pulton Rollins, and his codefendants, Willie Slater and John Palmer, were charged with two…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by218 opinions
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.