Legal Opinion

People v. Nasalga

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1996No. S041974PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In 1992 the Legislature amended Penal Code1 section 12022.6, subdivisions (a) and (b), effective June 30, 1992, to increase the amount of the property loss required for a one-year enhancement from $25,000 to $50,000 and to increase the loss required for a two-year enhancement from $100,000 to $150,000. (Stats. 1992, ch. 104, § 1.) In this case we address the question of whether a person who stole $124,000 (§ 487, subd. (b)(3)) before the 1992 amendment of section 12022.6, but whose conviction was not final at the time the amendment became operative, is entitled to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. VieiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. Martinez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. YearwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API