Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Doyle

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 3, 1998No. 98-2521PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial (reported at 9 F.Supp.2d 1033 (W.D.Wis.1998)) of a motion for a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a recently enacted Wisconsin statute that decrees life imprisonment for anyone who performs a “partial birth abortion.” Wis. Stat. §§ 939.50(3)(a), 940.16(2). We stayed both the enforcement of the statute and further proceedings in the district court pending the decision of this appeal.

The statute defines a partial birth abortion as “an abortion in which a person partially *465vaginally delivers a living child, causes the death of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. We Care Hair Development, Inc. v. Eric Engen, Joel Sundquist, Joann M. SundquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Hope Clinic v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API