Legal Opinion
William Ernest Kuenzel v. Richard F. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 13, 2007No. 06-11986PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
William Ernest Kuenzel (“Kuenzel”) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The only question before us is whether Kuenzel has satisfied the exceptions to the procedural bar announced in Siebert v. Allen, 455 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2006) (“Siebert IF). We decline to address this issue when the district court has not; and, therefore, we vacate the district court’s order and remand for further proceedings.
This appeal is Kuenzel’s second. The district court originally dismissed Kuen-zel’s petition as time-barred; the district court concluded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Arthur v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Micheal Wyzykowski v. Department of Corrections, Harry K. Singletary, Attorney General, Robert ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Riva v. FiccoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- William Ernest Kuenzel v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Kuenzel v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
- Kuenzel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- David Timothy Moore v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.