Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 21, 2006No. 03-14304PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
An Alabama jury found petitioner Thomas D. Arthur (“Arthur”) guilty of capital murder and recommended that he be sentenced to death. After exhausting his state court remedies, Arthur filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied Arthur’s habeas petition, but granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on four issues. After a thorough review of the record, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment denying Arthur habeas relief.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts1
On 1…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Arthur v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Travaglio v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Rozzelle v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Downs v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.