Legal Opinion
Allen v. Nicholson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 27, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0741 (RCL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court comes defendant, James R. Nicholson’s motion [8] to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint [1] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition [11], the reply [13], the entire record herein, and applicable law, the Court finds that defendant’s motion [8] to dismiss will be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 7, 2003, plaintiff submitted a request for a leave of absence from March 21, 2003 to April 21, 2003, at the end of which he indicated he would resign from his position…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lindell v. Landis Corp. 401 (K) PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Sherley v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Devorah v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Giri v. National Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.