Legal Opinion
Lindell v. Landis Corp. 401 (K) Plan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1462 (PLF)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Mot.”), plaintiffs opposition (“Opp.”) and defendants’ reply. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that the issues raised in this motion are better understood as a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant case law, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Scolaro v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections and EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- America v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Baseload Energy, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- America v. BarretoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.