Legal Opinion

Sherley v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 27, 2009No. Civ. 1:09-cv-1575 RCLPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motion [22] to Dismiss. Plaintiffs brought this suit to enjoin defendants from taking further actions to implement and apply the guidelines promulgated by the National Institute of Health (“NIH”) that provide for public funding of human embryonic stem cell (“hESC”) research. 74 Fed.Reg. 32,170 (July 7, 2009). Defendants’ motion asserts, among other things, that plaintiffs lack standing. This Court agrees with defendants and finds that plaintiffs lack standing. Accordingly, the Court will grant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. James Sherley v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Sherley v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Export-Import Bank of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Doe v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API