Legal Opinion

Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 27, 1995No. 94-4046-SACPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEWMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Testimony at Trial of Plaintiffs Proffered Expert Witness, Nathan Shechter, M.D. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff has filed a response. Defendant has filed a reply. The matter is ready for the court’s decision.

*678Defendant moves to exclude any testimony at the trial of the action from plaintiffs retained expert -witness, Nathan Shechter, M.D., on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to serve a proper disclosure under Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). A medical report signed by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  2. Todd v. Bear Valley Village ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. American Stock Exchange, LLC v. Mopex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Reed v. BinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  5. Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API