Legal Opinion

Underhill Coal Mining Co. v. Hixon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal raises the issue of whether in a trespass and conversion action a good faith defense is available to bona fide purchasers for value who purchased cut timber from a third party who had converted the timber.

The trial court answered this question in the affirmative, and granted summary judgment to the bona fide purchasers for value. We reverse.

The bona fide purchasers for value are Ronald Rishel and Rodney VanVoorhis. Underhill Coal Mining Company (“Underhill”), the owner of the timbered property, brought an action in trespass and conversion against the purchasers as *221well…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Norriton East Realty Corp. v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. First National Bank of Blairstown v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Linwood Harvestore, Inc. v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. L.B. Foster Co. v. Charles Caracciolo Steel & Metal Yard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Hranec Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Metalico Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Moore Equipment Company v. HalfertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API