Legal Opinion

State v. Nemeti

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1991No. 16979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, Chief Justice

(on reassignment).

Tim A. Nemeti (Nemeti) was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. SDCL 22-42-5. On appeal, the sole issue is whether Nemeti’s consent to search his vehicle was voluntary. We hold that it was and therefore affirm.

Highway Patrolman Jim Feltman (Felt-man) stopped the car that 31-year-old college student Nemeti was driving because it was traveling sixty miles an hour in a speed zone posted fifty-five miles per hour. After he obtained Nemeti’s driver’s license, Feltman saw that Nemeti appeared nervous and uneasy. He asked Nemeti if he had been drinking or had any open…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. ZachodniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. KrebsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. MoratoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State of Iowa v. Brent Alan HaugeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API