Legal Opinion
Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 19, 2024No. 3:19-cv-06361Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BENJAMIN STIRRATT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS (DMR) 8 Plaintiffs, AMENDED ORDER ON JOINT 9 v. DISCOVERY LETTER AND RELATED SEALING MOTIONS 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 394, 395, 419, 435 11 Defendants. 12 This amends Docket No. 443 by adding a correction to the court’s order on the Second 13 Motion to Seal, page 12, line 10. 14 The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Lead Plaintiff Boston Retirement System 15 (“BRS”) seeks to compel production of 12 documents listed on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.