Legal Opinion
Portland Foundry & Machine Co. v. Gibson
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1916No. 22,928PublishedCited by 15 opinions
From Jay Circuit Court; James J. Moran, Judge. Action by Jacob M. Gibson against the Portland Foundry and Machine Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This action is for the recovery of salary alleged to be due under a certain written contract by which appellee agreed to become and act as superintendent of the plant of appellant at Portland. That clause of the contract which gives rise to this controversy is as follows:
“As a guarantee of the faithful performance of contract the party of the second part (appellee) promises to deposit in the First National Bank, of Portland, Indiana, the sum of ($50.00) Fifty Dollars each month for a period of six (6) months, beginning August 1, 1910, and *344the same to be left bn demand in this bank, provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Judd v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Porter v. ChoenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Shira v. State ex rel. HamIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Cook & Bernheimer Co. v. HagedornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Baldwin Piano Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Spickelmeir v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.