People v. Ford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial following testimony by the victim’s mother that the victim was shown a photograph of defendant at her home. Although that testimony bolstered the identification testimony of the victim, reversal is not required because “the evidence of identity is so strong that there is no serious issue upon the point” (People v Caserta, 19 NY2d 18, 21; cf., People v Wallace, 187 AD2d 998). Both the victim and his girlfriend, each of whom testified at trial, had unobstructed views of defendant during…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. HeideNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. BouyeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CasertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BridgefourthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001