Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bolton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1994No. OBAD No. 1127. SCBD No. 3960Published

1Opinion of the Court

880 P.2d 339 (1994)

STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

Darrell L. BOLTON, Respondent.

OBAD No. 1127. SCBD No. 3960.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 17, 1994.

John E. Douglas, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Ass'n, Oklahoma City, for complainant.

Darrell L. Bolton, Pro se.

OPALA, Justice.

In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record[1] sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint's disposition? and (2) Is a ninety-day suspension with imposition of costs an appropriate disciplinary sanction to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Simms; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Watt.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API