Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Sheridan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1935No. Civ. 9624PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendants John F. Sheridan and John Franklin Music Company, a corporation, brought this action seeking a decree declaring void as against the plaintiff herein, certain transfers made by said judgment debtors to defendant Edna M. Sheridan. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed, and from said judgment defendants appeal.

The parties to this controversy have submitted voluminous briefs covering the story of the financial affairs of the defendants. This story is an interesting one not only because of the fact that the defendants rose practically from poverty to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Benson v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Bekins v. DieterleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Adams v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Klein v. RossiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  4. Peterson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Abbey v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API