Legal Opinion

Glassman v. Unocal Exploration Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 25, 2001No. 390, 2000PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider the fiduciary-duties owed by a parent corporation to the subsidiary’s minority stockholders in the context of a “short-form” merger. Specifically, we take this opportunity to reconcile a fiduciary’s seemingly absolute duty to establish the entire fairness of any self-dealing transaction with the less demanding requirements of the short-form merger statute. The statute authorizes the elimination of minority stockholders by a summary process that does not involve the “fair dealing” component of entire fairness. Indeed, the statute does not contemplate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  2. Montgomery Cellular Holding Co. v. DoblerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. In re Wayport, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. In re Pure Resources, Inc., Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API