Legal Opinion
Richard N. Schuck v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1994No. 93-3103PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service, appeal the decision of the District Court remanding this case to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) for further consideration of the removal penalty imposed on plaintiff, Richard Schuck, for selling a controlled substance to a co-worker. For the reasons stated, we vacate the District Court’s decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
In June 1988, the United States Postal Service removed eight employees, including plaintiff, after concluding an undercover…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David Foster and Catherine Foster v. Sigmund Barilow and Margaret BarilowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Power v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Stanley B. Parker v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sierra Club v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sierra Club v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Latin Americans for Social & Economic Development v. Administrator of the Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Community First Bank v. National Credit Union AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Kurt Meister v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.