Kurt Meister v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.
An agency is not entitled to deference simply because it is an agency. It is true that agencies are more specialized than courts are. But for courts to defer to them, agencies must do more than announce the fact of their comparative advantage; they must actually use it. And that means, among many other things, that the agency must apply — rather than disregard' — the relevant statutory and regulatory criteria.
Kurt Meister, a Michigan attorney appearing pro se, argues that the United States Forest Service disregarded the relevant criteria here. Specifically, he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Safari Club International v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Latin Americans for Social & Economic Development v. Administrator of the Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Kentuckians for the Commonwealth v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.