Legal Opinion
Lankster v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 22, 2009No. 08-860CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Albert Lankster seeks to recover a payment he made to the Department of Education in connection with a settlement of his federal student loans. Mi’. Lankster claims that he has become totally and permanently disabled and consequently that a regulation issued by the Department of Education entitles him to a return of any payments he made on his student loans. See Compl. ¶ 4. The government has moved to dismiss Mr. Lankster’s complaint, asserting that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Lankster’s claim, that Mr. Lankster’s claim is barred by the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Abernethy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.