Legal Opinion

Amanda Smith v. R. Ray

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2015No. 12-1503PublishedCited by 340 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge AGEE joined.

TRAXLER, Chief Judge:

Officer R.R. Ray appeals a district court order denying his motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity concerning Amanda Smith’s excessive force claim. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

“In reviewing the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity, we accept as true the facts that the district court concluded may be reasonably inferred from the record when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Waterman v. Batton, 393…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by340 opinions

  1. Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Tina Ray v. Michael RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. E.W. v. Rosemary DolgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Tiffanie Hupp v. State Trooper Seth CookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. Estate of Armstrong Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Village of PinehurstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API