Legal Opinion

Ayoub v. Harry Winston, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 29, 2022No. 4:21-cv-01599Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAMER SROUR AYOUB, Case No. 21-cv-01599-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SECOND 9 v. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA SETTLEMENT 10 HARRY WINSTON, INC., Re: ECF No. 45 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Samer Srour Ayoub’s second unopposed motion for approval 14 of a settlement of claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),

Cal. Lab. Code § 15

2698 et seq. ECF No. 45. The Court will grant the motion for approval of the settlement amount 16 and grant Ayoub’s request for an award of attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.