Legal Opinion

ROCHESTER EASTSIDE RESIDENTS FOR AP v. CITY OF ROCHESTER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 2017No. CA 16-01413Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 580 CA 16-01413 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF ROCHESTER EASTSIDE RESIDENTS FOR APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT, INC., AND IGATOPSFY, LLC, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CITY OF ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROCHESTER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, ROCHESTER CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF ROCHESTER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING, STEVE CLEASON, ALDI, INC., CRLYN ACQUISITIONS, LLC, CBL, LLC, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (ALAN J. KNAUF…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. King v. Saratoga County Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Penfield Panorama Area Community, Inc. v. Town of Penfield Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. DAWLEY, DESIREE v. WHITETAIL 414, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API