Legal Opinion

White v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1990No. 900034, 900035PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

These cases are before the court on defendants’ motion to consolidate, to stay the appeal proceedings, and to remand the cases to the district court for consideration of a motion brought under Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to amend the judgment appealed in each case. The motion to consolidate was earlier granted. The motion to remand is now denied. The district court is directed to consider and decide the rule 60(b) motion.

Judgment was granted in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants. Plaintiffs appealed from the judgment in case No. 900034, arguing that the trial court erred…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. Susan B. Long and Philip H. Long v. Bureau of Economic Analysis, United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Smith v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Baker v. Western Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Honie v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BisnerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LaraUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State in Interest of E.M.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API