Legal Opinion
State v. Newman
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1985No. 14995PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
HISTORY
On April 23, 1982, Charles and Hong Newman were charged with delivery of drug paraphernalia and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to deliver, in violation of I.C. § 37-2734B, a section of Idaho’s Drug Paraphernalia Act. 1 On Decem ber 23, 1982, both defendants filed motions to dismiss the charges pending against them, arguing that Idaho’s Drug Paraphernalia Act is unconstitutional. The state and the defendants stipulated to, and the district court conducted, a facial consideration of the Act’s constitutionality; thus, the issue considered at trial was that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.