Legal Opinion
Cutaiar v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 12, 1979No. 78-1380PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor, responsible for enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., issued an opinion letter stating that certain transactions by the trustees of two union employee benefit plans were in violation of the Act. The trustees sought, and the district court granted, a declaratory judgment that the Secretary’s letter was “null and void.” This appeal requires us to decide whether the trustees’ complaint presented a justiciable controversy, and, if so, whether there was a violation of ERISA.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
3Cited by85 opinions
- Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Thiokol Corporation v. Department Of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Jennifer Sweda v. University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.