Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 5, 1930No. 30055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The plaintiff was employed as conductor on a passenger train of -the defendant railroad company at a salary of $430 per month. He had been in the service of the company for 37 years continuously, and was one of the senior conductors, with the expectation of retiring some day on a pension. He was discharged for an alleged violation or neglect of a rule of the company by failing to-include in his report to -the auditor, of the passenger receipts of one of his trips, the fare of a passenger who rode on his train, and by failing to give a satisfactory account of the omission. He brought this suit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Shea v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Fritz Jahncke, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Craig v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Glass v. HoblitzelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Swilley v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Cousins v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Miller v. San Francisco Church Extension Society of Methodist Episcopal ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API