Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Booker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1928No. 9098PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

This suit was brought by appellee to recover of appellant the sum of $1,712.74, with interest from November 19, 1921, alleged to be due him under a contract of employment made with him by appellant. The petition alleges, in substance:

That on and for several years prior to September 20, 1939, plaintiff was in the employment of the defendant as a car inspector; that on the date last mentioned the United States Director General of Railways, in control of the operation of defendant railway, entered into a written agreement with the employees of defendant, acting through their labor organization,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Harper v. HassardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Texas Midland Railroad v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ramos v. Henry C. Beck Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1985
  4. Craig v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API