Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Farley

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 4, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLCOTT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an Order of the Superior Court in a second appeal from the Industrial Accident Board reversing the Board and ordering compensation to be paid the claimant, Eugene F. Farley. The employer, Sears, Roebuck and Company, appeals.

It would serve no useful purpose to detail the facts of this matter. Suffice it to say that Farley was hired by Sears in 1951, and was promoted to display supervisor in 1953. He was demoted to displayman in 1965, and was replaced as supervisor by a younger man new to the store. His replacement testified that Farley was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Debernard v. ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Reese v. Home Budget CenterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Clements v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Avon Products, Inc. v. LamparskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Wilmington Fibre Specialty Company v. RyndersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API