Legal Opinion
Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1981No. 80-3121PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
In the late 1960s, the City of Akron was confronted by the need to develop new sources of energy and to find alternative methods of waste disposal. In an attempt to alleviate both problems, the City decided to construct a $55 million energy recycling plant, a facility that generates energy in the form of steam heat from the incineration of trash.1 Plaintiff-appellants seek injunctive relief against several actions undertaken by the City and other defendants to guarantee the feasibility of the plant, alleging that those actions violate the federal antitrust laws and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- L & H Sanitation, Inc. v. Lake City Sanitation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Morrow v. SouthDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City Of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.