Legal Opinion
Austria v. Shaw
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Section 470 of the Judiciary Law requires an attorney residing out of State to maintain an office here in order to practice in this State. This motion addresses that requirement as to an attorney who maintains "desk space” in another’s office.
*971Plaintiffs motion, pursuant to CPLR 4403, to confirm the report of Judicial Hearing Officer Morton R. Tolleris, is granted.
Defendant moves to dismiss the action on the grounds that it was invalid, having been brought by an attorney not maintaining a bona fide office in New York State, and not having filed the required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re the Application of TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- In re the Estate of FordanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RossneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lichtenstein v. EmersonNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Schoenefeld v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Moran v. HartingNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. CorbettYonkers City Court · 1998