Legal Opinion

Smith v. Detroit & T. S. L. R.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 9, 1909No. 2,140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law. Action by William Smith against the Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company. On motion to remand and on demurrer.

1Opinion of the CourtSater, District Judge

(sitting by designation). This is an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received through the defendant’s negligence.

The amended petition and the affidavits in support of the motion objecting to the court’s jurisdiction and asking for the dismissal of the *507action show that the defendant is a corporation duly organized and incorporated under the laws of the state of Michigan; that at the time the plaintiff in the course of his émployment was injured it was engaged in interstate commerce; and that the plaintiff is a citizen of the Western division of this district. It is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Wiley v. SinklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Swafford v. TempletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wabash Ry. Co. v. BridalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HesterlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Garrett v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Fithian v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1911
  5. Bacon v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API