Martino v. Adourian
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
The question raised by this appeal is whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of laio. The court below directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for-a new trial was denied. This appeal followed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the facts are as follows: At 8:30 p. m. on December 1, 1946, the plaintiff, a woman sixty-six years of age, started to walk across the intersection of Sixty-fourth Street and Hayerford Avenue, from the southwest to the northwest corner. Haverford Avenue is a heavily…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Johnson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Malitovsky v. Harshaw Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Goodall v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thompson v. GormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kane v. Scranton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Polinelli v. Union Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Lieberman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Deibold v. SommervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.