Legal Opinion

Lambros v. Zrakas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1951No. 101PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.

Tbe defendants’ chief exceptive assignment of error relates to tbe refusal of tbe court below to nonsuit tbe case as to tbe defendant Sophie Zrakas.

It is alleged in the complaint that both defendants, “acting by and through their son and agent Charles Zrakas, engaged and employed tbe . . . services of plaintiff for medical diagnosis . . . and . . . surgical treatment upon defendant Mrs. Sophie Zrakas.”

It is admitted in the defendants’ answer that “the defendant Thomas K. Zrakas, acting by and through his son Charles Zrakas, engaged and employed the professional services of the plaintiff, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Maley v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Maley v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Webb v. . RosemondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API