Legal Opinion

Hahn v. City of Bethlehem

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1936No. Appeal, 119PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

An award having been made by viewers for the taking of part of plaintiffs’ land in connection with the widening of Nazareth Pike, the City of Bethlehem appealed, an issue was framed, and trial by jury had in the court below to determine the amount of damages to which plaintiffs were entitled.

In examining his expert witnesses counsel for plaintiffs asked them what in their opinion was the difference between the fair market value of the property immediately before and the fair market value immediately after the road construction took place. Defendant’s counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. McSorley v. Avalon Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Bridgman Realty Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Beck v. Penna. Poughkeepsie & Boston R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. White Deer Creek Improvement Co. v. SassamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manganese Steel Forge Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Mott v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Pittsburgh Terminal Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Apple Storage Co. v. School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. United States v. 875 Acres of LandDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API