Legal Opinion

Beck v. Penna. Poughkeepsie & Boston R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1892No. Appeal, No. 104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 104, July T., 1891, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., June T., 1889, No. 58, on verdict for plaintiff, Thomas H. Beck. Trespass to recover damages sustained by reason of the location and construction of the defendant’s road. On the trial before Reeder, J., plaintiff called a number of witnesses who were familiar with the property, and who wore asked as to the effect produced upon it by the construction of defendant’s road.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 104, July T., 1891, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., June T., 1889, No. 58, on verdict for plaintiff, Thomas H. Beck. Trespass to recover damages sustained by reason of the location and construction of the defendant’s road. On the trial before Reeder, J., plaintiff called a number of witnesses who were familiar with the property, and who wore asked as to the effect produced upon it by the construction of defendant’s road. The character of this testimony appears by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict for defendant for 11,780.80 and judgment thereon.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The first and ninth specifications of error do not conform to the rules of court, and will not be considered. The remaining *272specifications present but a single question, which is sufficiently set forth in the second specification, as follows: “ The court erred in not sustaining the defendant’s objection to the following questions, put by the plaintiff to his witness, Stephen Shoemaker : Q. In your judgment did the building of this railroad increase or decrease the value of the farm? Objected to as incompetent. By the Court. — The objection is overruled. Defendant excepts. Bill…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hope v. Philadelphia & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Hahn v. City of BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Elizabeth Township Sanitary Authority CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API