Legal Opinion

Moskin v. Goldstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Oakland; Gillespie (Glenn C.), J. Case by Julius Moskin and another against Benjamin Goldstein for double damages for the wrongful detention of leased premises. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The defendant, a retail clothing merchant, entered into a written lease of certain premises in Pontiac from Henry Harnack, the owner, on August 16, 1916, for a term of five years, expiring on August 1, 1921. On June 2, 1921, Harnack conveyed the premises, subject to the lease, to the plaintiffs. Defendant did not vacate at the expiration of the term, and proceedings for restitution under section 13240 et seq., 3 Comp. Laws 1915, were begun before a circuit court commissioner, resulting in a judgment in defendant’s favor. On appeal to the circuit court, the plaintiffs had judgment for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. FellersMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Edwards v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chandler v. ChildsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hansen v. PrinceMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hendrickson v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCullagh v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. 165 Broadway Building, Inc. v. City Investing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Plaza Investment Co. v. AbelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jones v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API