Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided March 29, 2010No. 08-0719/CGPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the judgment of the Court.
At trial, the military judge limited Appellant’s cross-examination of Cadet SR, the Government’s only witness on his three convictions related to sexual misconduct. We granted review to decide whether Appellant was denied his right to confront his accuser on those three specifications. We hold that Appellant was not denied his right to confront his accuser, and affirm.
I
A general court-martial consisting of members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of attempting to disobey an order, going from his place of duty, sodomy, extortion, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. EllerbrockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. LaBellaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. Guzman2U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- In Re C. PU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.