Legal Opinion

United States v. Ellerbrock

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 31, 2011No. 10-0483/ARPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review to determine whether the military judge erred in applying Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 412 to prevent Appellant from introducing evidence of the alleged victim’s first marital affair to show a motive to fabricate the accusation against Appellant.1 We hold that the evidence was constitutionally required, that the military judge abused her discretion by refusing to admit the evidence, and that it was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

I

A

In accordance with his pleas, Appellant was found guilty of conspiracy, destruction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. LRM v. KastenbergCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  2. United States v. EriksonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. Payton-O'brien and RavenscraftNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  4. United States v. Captain JASON M. ALSTONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. Sergeant FRANCIS A. CARISTAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API