Legal Opinion

Ross v. Kunkel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

Upon the trial of the issues under the pleadings the evidence established the following undisputed facts. On June 20, 1948, the plaintiffs, Ross and his wife (hereinafter called the “Rosses”), were the owners under a land contract of lot No. 1, block No. 9 in the plat of Miramar, a subdivision on a lake in Walworth county. The lot as platted is fifty feet in width and one hundred forty-five feet in depth; and there is a cottage with other improvements on the lot. On June 20, 1948, Rosses entered into an exclusive listing contract with the plaintiff Sullivan, a real-estate broker, for the sale…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buntrock v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Neff v. RubinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Petre v. SlowinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Breen v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kons v. PallangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langemeier v. Urwiler Oil & Fertilizer, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Walter F. Kelly and Sandra J. Hays, Forfeiture Purchasers-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Walter F. Kelly and Sandra J. Hays, Forfeiture Purchasers-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API