Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Shore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 2012No. 102,938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

Plaintiff Daniel L. Hemphill appeals the district court’s statute of limitations dismissal of his lawsuit against his uncle, defendant Jay F. Shore, as trustee of the Shore Family Trust. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Hemphill v. Shore, 44 Kan. App. 2d 595, 239 P.3d 885 (2010), and we accepted this appeal on Hemphill’s petition for review.

We hold that three of four of Hemphill’s causes of action are time barred, but his claim based on constructive fraud survives. The controlling trust instrument established a confidential relationship…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Markham, etc v. FayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Miller v. Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & GlassmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doe v. PopravakCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  2. Roenne v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Sutherland v. Sutherland TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  4. Crosby v. ESIS InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. Davis v. MalesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API