Lehman v. City of Topeka
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Standridge, J.:
Gwendolyn Lehman appeals die district court’s decision to dismiss her negligence action against the City of Topeka (the City), arguing the court erred in applying the Kansas saving statute, K.S.A. 60-518, in a manner that failed to save her action filed outside the applicable statute of limitations. Lehman contends the statute of limitations was tolled because (1) she never received notice of tlie dismissal of the previous case and (2) die automatic stay that was entered in die previous case due to the bankruptcy of one the codefendants operated as a stay of the entire case.
Fact…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- The Matter of Zale Corporation, Debtor. Alan D. Feld, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Zale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. Kansas State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- Doyle v. NordstromCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021